Positive views of the International Monetary Fund Essay

Is there any harder job than regulating all of the international markets specie? Probably non, the topic being discussed throughout this lookk will be the international m onetary blood and its involvement in the international market. untold has been said about the I. M. F whether it is positive or prejudicious, neo-Marxist Che Guevara said The interests of the IMF consist the big international interests that seem to be established and concentrated in Wall Street. Here he criticizes how the IMF is considered to be run by the linked States which occupies a veto exponent in the decision making at the IMF, this is important to see because it brings up the other side to the IMF, the side that is non so positive and the one that people feel very comminuted of. Even though people uniform Che and Stieglitz bring up the negative characteristics of the IMF it is not the precisely qualities that the fund has.The IMF has also has many positive qualities, this essay will go over the se qualities by looking at the IMFs debt restructuring cases, looking at how the decisions atomic number 18 made in the fund and in conclusion the long term positive order that the IMF has on promoting democracy. As mentioned in advance the IMF has gone through very a good deal criticism in past years, as yet the locomote they have done on debt relief has done ofttimes to boost up their reputation. Cases like Argentina, the Domini force out commonwealth and oftentimes more than(prenominal)(prenominal) show that the IMF is very capable of improving conditions within a province by debt restructuring programs.In 2005 the IMF started debt reconstruction in Argentina, the process was held back more that they would have liked due to court proceedings in rude(a) York. After this delay the IMF was able to do some real work in debt sub with Argentina. The rude participated 76% in the debt modify and since indeed they have seen much improvements in their debt structure and debt-profile. In early whitethorn the Argentinean authorities regained market access for the first time since the year 2001. as well as as a result of rebalancing of the countries credit rating, spreads of Argentinas immaterial debt fell tremendously from 6000 basis points to 462 basis points. ( ) The Dominican Republic is other(prenominal) country which was aided by the IMF for debt reconstruction, which ended in success. The Dominican Republic started on an scotch recovery route by utilizing stand-by arrangements, which are. The invention of this program was to eliminate the financial needs during 2005-06 through a debt exchange process and more, all of which being supported by IDB and the World Bank.The debt exchange ended on May 15th 2005, and had a very gritty participation rate by the Dominican Republic and this allowed for a voluminous relief of overall cash flow (576 million US) for the government, an increase in the maturity profile of the debt and a decline in over cxxx basis points which clearly outperformed the rest of the market ( ). These are great examples to how the IMF can have a positive influence on the economic conditions of a certain country.Apart from these cases there are many people who shut up oppose the IMF and its ways of intervening, like Joseph Stieglitz wrote in his book that the IMF set the impede so high for debt relief that few qualified (Stieglitz, 227), yet cases like Argentina and the Dominican do prove their potential for aid. Decisions can be crucial to ones life, drawing the line between failures or success, same goes for the International monetary fund except their decisions could be the going away between saving a country and having that countrys economic system fail.When a person invests into a company or throne and holds the majority of shares in it, that person can pretty much pick out all the decisions he wants. It is very similar in the IMF the country fitting fragment attains a certain number of vote s and then receives more take power when that country invests more money.This is stated in further point in the Funds article XII, section 5 Each member shall have two vitamin C fifty vote plus one additional vote for each part of its quota equivalent to one hundred thousand U. S dollars (Gold, 18). The two hundred fifty basic votes were meant to dampen a chance to the countries who have just became members or were not by and large developed, it was also intended so that countries were not entirely able to demoralize their voting power, as do most people perceive the get together States did to gain its so-called Veto power. Gold (1972) brings a quote from an mute source that brings up the argument of why all countries do not have the same total of voting power.It is said that it would be foolish to have flyspeck countries have the same voting power as the larger ones, since it is for sure that there will be more small country members than there are large. Contrary to that point, he says that it would be unsporting to give voting power on the solemn basis of how much money they put in. Although the exact figures of recent years are unavailable, the effect of the basic votes were quite visible in the 70s, where 37 countries of the 137 members of the fund had basic votes that accounted for half or more of their total voting power (Gold, 19).The counter argument this fiber of voting formula could be that it resembles to much a private corporation, yet evidence shows that it has help the small countries to at least attain a sufficient amount of votes. People are very likely to pre-judge the outcome of a certain event, even without hold to see what will happen in the end. This can also be the case for views against the IMF, judging its intervention or programs on the basis of the results produced in the first year. A study was done by Nelson and Wallace to see what type of influence the IMF lending plans had on democracy inside the country obtainin g the loan.What they set up in their study was that the impingement of the IMF loans did not have very much effect on democracy within the given country in the time frame of one year, but the impact of IMF lending only took place between three and five years ( Nelson & Wallace, 24-25). over again this hints to the fact that anti-IMF people may be quick to judge the impact that the Fund has on whatever country being helped.Other results from the Nelson and Wallace look for was that the impact of the IMFs lending could vary from one part to another such as in Eastern Europe where one could see a 3. increase in polity1 score over a finale of 5-years and then in East-Asia there was a negative change of 1. 5 in the polity score (Nelson & Wallace, 27-28). Again these results presented shows that the IMFs importee can have many different levels of influence depending on the region that is being lent the money. One thing is for sure, it is that there are more cases of improved polity 31 and having two regions that were not probative results (Nelson & Wallace, 27-28). Yet, anti-IMF people may say that it is unfair that that one country has a negative outcome and the IMF is unfair and bias towards the other countries.In conclusion, the IMF shows many positive characteristics to their involvement in the world. Their positive ranges from helping create countries to reconstruct and eliminate their debt by means of a debt exchange with the IMF to the IMF having a positive influence on democracy when loaning money to a country. Also, the way that the IMF voting power is distributed shows a fair way to doing it by awarding all members of the fund with a start up amount of basis points to be able to have some power.