Report on Two Software Programs with Business Application

Recommendation Report In this report, you argon going to chance upon twain software programs with business applications and compare them according to quaternary readable criteria. You will and then recommend one program over other on the basis of your affinity. Your report will be written to me coin Im your boss, we run together in a tiny company, and Ive asked you to find the best program for our purposes. The woof of programs is up to you, just now you must shoot two programs that do roughly the same thing. tire outt choose a tax program and a spreadsheet, for example.You then postulate to think of the criteria you are going to use to make the comparison. Your choice of criteria is very important. This classs the basis for your comparison if you dont choose concrete, specific, and pertinent criteria that allow you to make a detailed comparison of the two programs, your comparison is not going to be informative or significant. Also, one of the criteria you choose must be the make up of the program. This will, obviously, be a very guileless point of comparison. Your recommendation report will have three sections The approach will give a short substructure to the two programs youve elect to discuss tell us the name of the software, who manufactures it, etc. You are similarly going to inform me as to the criteria you choose to use to make the comparison, and wherefore you choose those criteria. The Findings section will compare the two programs according to cost and the three other criteria youve chosen. The format you choose for this section is up to you, scarce the comparison should be easy to process visually. This will be the extended section of your report. The Recommendation In this section you will describe wherefore one of the programs you have discussed in the Findings section is better than the other one. You need to make conduct reference to what youve discovered in the Findings section in order to to the full justify y our recommendation. Unsatisfactory Needs Work copasetic Exemplary Mark Introduction Introduction absent, or one cistron absent or completely inadequate. Outline of programs too general. Introduction of four criteria lacks specifics, no justification. -Clear and concise outline of two programs-Clear, concise introduction of four criteria. Clear, concise and detailed outline of two programs-Clear, concise and detailed introduction of four criteria. /10 Findings -Many details absent or vague. -Criteria make meaningful comparison impossible. -Document is a mess. -Details are go alongly absent or vague. -Criteria are flawed in some way which renders the comparison passably ineffective. -Organization detracts from sleep of visual processing, parallel form mistakes. Programs compared with a reasonable amount of detail. Criteria comparatively well-chosen. Organization does not interfere with visual processing, parallel form used. Programs compared fully according to cost and three other criteria. -Criteria are well-chosen and work to fully illuminate the two programs. -Organization allows for ease of visual processing, parallel form used. /25 Recommenda-tion Reasons not clear or detailed, section too short. Gives general, somewhat vague reasons why one program was chosen and the other was not. Gives clear and detailed reasons why one program was chosen and the other was not. Gives specific, clear and detailed reasons why one program was chosen and the other was not. /10 Grammar and Style Errors, study and minor, pervasive. Subheadings not used. Two or three major errors. More than five minor errors. Subheadings used. -One or two major errors. lead to five minor errors. Subheadings used. No major errors. One or two minor errors. Subheadings used. /15