'Relative ethics Essay\r'

'Relative morals is where determinations are made with the circumstances in mind. For instance the culture and traditions of the place, the individuals, and society. Examples of relative ethical motive is utilitarianism and situation ethics. Relative ethics basin be seen to be a ordinary snuggle to decision making because it is wide of different values, it is more realistic that n matchlessntity is right or defective, it is more dependent to atheists, and is considers emotions as important. However it is more intricate and halts decisions harder, it female genitals be used as an excuse to act in an basal flair, it implies that we should non have laws and it does not cherish worldwide human rights.\r\nRelative ethics is tolerant of different cultures. For example incisively because in one place it is considered pervert for women to have an education in one coun punctuate e.g. Islamic countries, it doesn’t pie-eyed that in the UK women should not have an educa tion. The UK is not mor all toldy superior and should not try to implement its own morals on whatsoever other land. This may depend fair in one way plainly it actually means that whatsoever act can be bankable and doesn’t protect our human rights, sexism is malign and women should never be discriminated against no liaison their religion. most laws need to be implicit. psyche in a different country may claim that for example snap and torture are part of their culture, but we know this is abuse.\r\nRelative ethics can be seen as fair because in it in that respect are no absolute objective rights or wrongs. The right liaison to do depends on the situation. For example, if a womanhood take food out of greed because it would be wrong. However if she stole food to feed her starving children then this is right. It is fairer than absolute ethics because an absolutist would set up that the woman shouldn’t steal withal if he children are dying of starvation. Obviously, this is wrong and so the relativist view if a fairer move up to decision making\r\nThe idea that there are no objective rights or wrongs can make relative decision making a slow process. In Utilitarianism, the consequences of each option have to be predicted and consequences. When each individual situation has to be considered, it can cause complications and ensuring every somebody gets a good result is difficult. Some may argue that the time it takes to make a decision about the morality of an act is causes those involved more pain and is unjust.\r\nIn conclusion I weigh that relative ethics is the best approach to making fair ethical decisions. However, I believe that some actions are wrong no matter the culture or time or individual. For example, discrimination is continuously wrong and torture of innocents and kidnapping is wrong. condescension this, relative ethics is tolerant of all cultures and does not believe that in any situations that one persons or coun try’s morals are superior to anothers.\r\n'